Tracy Wuster
According to the opinion piece?Truthinessology: The Stephen Colbert effect becomes an obsession in academia?in a recent Washington Post, academics love them some Stephen Colbert. ?So much so, that we write about him. ?Now, in the opinion of this author, writing in the voice of Colbert?s character, this is silly. ?He writes:
?ever since Colbert?s show, ?The Colbert Report,? began airing on Comedy Central in 2005, these ivory-tower eggheads have been devoting themselves to studying all things Colbertian. They?ve sliced and diced his comic stylings more ways than a Ginsu knife. Every academic discipline ? well, among the?liberal?arts, at least ? seems to want a piece of him.
And while the piece starts as a satire of the study of satire, it segues into a discussion of the reasons Colbert is a good person to study in our current political moment. ?In a way, I wish the article had continued its conceit of being written in Colbert?s voice?exploring the?liberal arts and questioning the serious study of the funny. ?In other words, I would like to hear what Stephen Colbert thinks of the study of Stephen Colbert. [If you want to do an interview, Mr. Colbert, contact me.]
But the piece also got me thinking about which current comedians/humorists academics are interested in beyond their entertainment value for what they might say about our society and the role of humor in it. ?Based on the relatively small sample of our posts on this page, the most significant?academically speaking?living humorists are listed in the poll below. ?Please vote. ?Your vote won?t mean anything. ?Superpac money will allow you to vote multiple times.
If you chose ?other? and wrote in a name, please consider writing a post for us on that person.
Like this:
Be the first to like this.
george zimmerman charged tony romo big sean sherri shepherd sherri shepherd arkansas razorbacks trisomy 18
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.